Elton John Calls UK Government ‘Absolute Losers’ Over AI Copyright Plans

Elton John Slams Government Over AI Copyright Exemptions

Music icon Sir Elton John has strongly criticised the UK government, calling them “absolute losers” and expressing feeling “incredibly betrayed” over proposals to exempt technology firms from copyright laws when using content for training AI models.

Allegations of ‘Theft’

Speaking out, Sir Elton warned that allowing AI companies to use artists’ material without compensation would constitute “theft, thievery on a high scale.” He voiced concern that young artists, lacking resources, would be unable to challenge large tech firms.

Parliamentary Battle on Transparency

The controversy follows a vote in the House of Lords to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill, seeking transparency requirements to ensure copyright holders grant permission for their work’s use. This amendment was passed with a significant majority. However, MPs in the House of Commons subsequently voted to reject this change, setting up a legislative back-and-forth between the two Houses.

Wider Concerns and Calls for Action

Sir Elton warned that the government’s path risked “robbing young people of their legacy and their income.” Playwright James Graham criticised either “complacency or the willingness to let Silicon Valley tech bros get it all their own way.” Tom Kiehl, chief executive of UK Music, suggested the government was close to sacrificing the UK music industry to appease American tech giants.

The debate comes after over 400 British musicians, writers, and artists, including Sir Paul McCartney, signed a letter urging the Prime Minister to update copyright laws to protect creators from AI.

Government Response

A government spokesperson stated that no changes would be considered unless they “work for creators” and that they are consulting on measures intended to allow both creative industries and AI companies to “flourish.” They mentioned consulting on proposals where developers could use content unless rights holders explicitly “opt out” and committed to publishing a report and economic impact assessment on the matter.